Pricing

New Zofran Birth Defect Lawsuit Alleges Zofran Caused Two Children’s Heart Defects

Download as PDF Single Release RSS Feed
Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Email

Zofranlegal.com has reported that a family in Minnesota has filed a lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline, alleging that both of their sons were born with cardiac defects as a result of their mother taking Zofran during her pregnancies.

Zofran, an anti-nausea drug, was promoted “off-label” by GlaxoSmithKline for use in pregnant women to treat morning sickness. The FDA had approved Zofran in 1991 to treat nausea in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation treatments and also in patients experincing nausea after surgery, but had never approved the drug for use in pregnant women. The drug was labeled a Category B drug, which indicated that not enough human clinical trials had been performed to determine the safety of the drug for use in pregnant women.

The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleges that “As a direct and proximate result of GSK’s conduct, the plaintiffs have suffered and incurred harm including severe and permanent pain and suffering, mental anguish, medical expenses, and other economic and noneconomic damages, and will require more constant and continuous medical monitoring and treatment than had they not been exposed to Zofran.” The mother, in this case, was prescribed Zofran during the first trimester of both of her pregnancies. Her first son was born in 2004 and her second son was born in 2006. Both children were born prematurely and both were diagnosed with congenital heart defects after their birth.

By 2000, GSK had been notified of 32 cases of birth defects in children born to women who had been prescribed Zofran, but did not inform the medical community or the public of this knowledge. The most common birth defects reported are an atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, heart murmurs, cleft palate, cleft lip, and renal defects. While the FDA has not released an official warning regarding Zofran birth defects, there have been multiple studies performed which suggest there is an increased risk when pregnant mothers are prescribed the drug.

In 2012, GSK settled a lawsuit with the U.S. Justice Department which alleged that GSK had promoted several medications, including Zofran, for “off-label” use. In the settlement GSK agreed to pay a total sum of three billion dollars.

For more information regarding this press release contact Michael Monheit, Esquire of ZofranLegal.com at 877-620-8411.

Download as PDF Single Release RSS Feed
Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Email

About ZofranLegal.com :

Sponsored by an alliance of attorneys, ZofranLegal.com is a resource for parents, families and birth defect survivors interested in learning more about litigation surrounding the nausea drug Zofran and its link to increased risks of major birth defects.

Contact ZofranLegal.com:

Michael Monheit

1368 Barrowdale Road, Rydal, PA 19046

1-877-620-8411

Social Media:

Additional News Releases From ZofranLegal.com:

April 30, 2016Lawsuit Alleges Invokana Side Effects Can Include Diabetic Ketoacidosis, a Life-Threatening Condition Related to Too Much Acid in the Body

April 29, 2016Zofran Lawsuit Update: Plaintiffs Question Why GSK Hasn’t Faced Stiffer Penalties

April 27, 2016Arkansas Mother Files Zofran Lawsuit Claiming Multiple Defects Caused By Drug

April 25, 2016Zofran Lawsuit Plaintiffs Applaud FDA’s Decision Regarding Folic Acid

April 22, 2016MyFoxBoston News Release Discusses Concerning Zofran Birth Defect Lawsuits And Drug Safety

April 22, 2016Zofran Lawsuit Plaintiffs Note Results Of Japanese Animal Studies Linking Birth Defects To Drug

April 22, 2016A Look Back At America’s First Zofran Lawsuit

April 21, 2016Significant Increase In Birth Defect Development Investigated By Washington State Amid Mounting Zofran Lawsuits

April 21, 2016Zofran Lawsuit Plaintiffs Make Note Of Canadian Label Differences On Drug Which Warn Of Use During Pregnancy

April 20, 2016Zofran Lawsuit Plaintiff Claims Infant’s Cleft Palate, Clubfoot, And Respiratory Distress Caused By Drug Exposure