Pricing

IVC Filter Lawsuit Case Filings Increase, As Focus Narrows In On Available Information On Pivotal Vein

Download as PDF Single Release RSS Feed
Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Email

TheProductLawyers.com explains the function of the inferior vena cava vein and outlines the links associated with IVC filters in many of the hundreds of lawsuits filed against the various manufacturers. The IVC is a huge vein that is tasked by the body with moving deoxygenated blood from the lower body to the heart, indicated by Healthline.com. Furthermore, Healthline specifies that the inferior vena cava transports blood to the right atrium of the heart, running behind the abdominal cavity due to two major leg veins linking at the same point.

IVC filters are the focus of common allegations made by plaintiffs, who claim the devices have caused various devastating health complications. IVC filters are designed to prevent blood clots from traveling to an individual's lungs, or heart by way of the pulmonary artery. The devices are commonly used by patients that are intolerant to anticoagulant drugs. Patients are offered 2 types of filters, one of which is temporary, while the other is permanently inserted into the inferior vena cava.

The Food And Drug Administration (FDA) claims that there were 921 reported adverse events with IVC filters from 2005 to 2010. The FDA indicated they received reports that included filter fractures, device migration, and in severe cases embolization. These reports motivated the FDA to encourage IVC filter patients to have their filters removed directly after the risk of pulmonary embolism diminished.

In the last several years, many patients who have suffered from IVC filter complications have filed lawsuits against the device manufacturers, Cook Medical and C.R. Bard. Hundreds of cases have been consolidated into Multidistrict Litigations, in both Arizona and Indiana. MDL No. 2570 against Cook Medical is being overseen in the Southern District of Indiana, and MDL No. 2461 against C.R. Bard is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court of Arizona. Both lawsuits are expected to conduct bellwether trials in the near future.

For more information on IVC filters, to ask questions or to schedule a consultation, contact an attorney at Banville Law by calling (888) 997-3792.

Download as PDF Single Release RSS Feed
Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Email

About TheProductLawyers.com :

TheProductLawyers.com is a resource website sponsored by Banville Law to provide information on pending lawsuits against defective products, drugs and medical devices.

Contact TheProductLawyers.com:

Banville Law

165 West End Ave #1h,
New York, NY 10023

888-478-9711

Additional News Releases From TheProductLawyers.com:

November 30, 2016Research Indicates New Form Of Treating Ovarian Cancer As Talcum Powder Lawsuit Numbers Climb

November 30, 2016Parties in Talcum Powder Lawsuit In Missouri Exchange Briefings

November 30, 2016J&J Requests Disclosure Of Third Party Litigation Financing In Talcum Powder Lawsuit

November 30, 2016Delaware Sees 10 New Talcum Powder Lawsuit Filings

November 29, 2016Philadelphia Talcum Powder Lawsuit Filed Against Johnson & Johnson To Proceed

November 29, 2016Pennsboro Woman Files Talcum Powder Lawsuit On Behalf Of Her Deceased Mother

November 29, 2016Bioimaging Helps Early Detection Of Ovarian Cancer As Talcum Powder Lawsuit Filings Continue

November 28, 2016FDA Follow-Up: How Officials Have Responded To The Influx Of Talcum Powder Lawsuit Filings

November 28, 2016Talc Uses: A Look At The Product At The Center Of Talcum Powder Lawsuit Filings

November 28, 2016More Women Encouraged To File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit After Verdicts